The production of cement and quicklime is energy demanding and causes high carbon dioxide emissions. This is because the fuel, which is used for heating, and the limestone, which is converted into quicklime at high temperatures, emits carbon dioxide. By replacing fossil fuels with renewable ones, emissions can be reduced by up to 40%.
The production of quicklime and cement takes place in direct-fired kilns, which means that the fuel, raw material and product are in direct contact with each other. The ash formed after combustion can react with the product. For quicklime, which requires a high calcium oxide content, this can have a negative effect on the product quality.
In laboratory studies, Sandström, doctoral student at the Department of Applied Physics and Electronics and the Industrial Doctoral School at Umeå University, and her colleagues have seen that the microstructure of quicklime alters when the limestone is exposed to ash from biofuels at high temperatures. They have also investigated how impurities found in limestone quarries affect the quality of the quicklime product.
The volatilization of trace and minor elements during cement clinker formation was studied both in a conventional combustion atmosphere and in an atmosphere with a high carbon dioxide content, corresponding to electrified heating.
Sandström’s research has contributed to an increased understanding of how impurities, either introduced via biomass or raw material, affect the product quality in quicklime production—and how electrified heating affects cement quality. This knowledge is important in the transition to more sutainable cement and quicklime production.
Tags: Biofuels, Carbon dioxide, Cement
Recent Posts
DPIIT promotes green logistics industry
Petronet LNG reports record volumes
TotalEnergies buys stake in wind farm to produce green hydrogen
Ports of Indiana, Port of Antwerp-Bruges partner on green shipping
Bhutan moves towards green transition
GCMD completes biofuel supply chain trials with Hapag-Lloyd
Airbus partners with Avolon on hydrogen aviation
Nuclear power transition more safe option for decarbonisation than coal