According to Alphaliner, methanol boxship orders have grown more rapidly than LNG in the last six months, while carriers have all but ditched orders for conventional fuel oil tonnage with just 8% of orders by capacity so far this year going for the old fashioned bunker fuel.
LNG and methanol dual-fuel tonnage now represent 40% of the container orderbook. It is the speed with which methanol has been embraced which has caught the eye.
The methanol-fuelled boxship orderbook now stands at 68 ships of 0.93m teu. The segment now represents 12% of the orderbook by capacity, versus less than 1% a year ago.
Ships designated LNG-, methanol– or ammonia-ready are not included in Alphaliner’s definition of green ships.
While containerlines have led the way towards methanol propulsion, dry bulk and tanker orders are also now in the mix. Another important shipping sector, the cruise business, is also keen to embrace methanol. Costa, TUI Cruises, Disney, and Norwegian have declared their interest in moving toward methanol as a fuel for their cruise ships.
MAN Energy Solutions, one of the key engine suppliers for this type of propulsion, said earlier this month that the interest in methanol as a fuel has surged and represents more than 30% of all its current, open pipeline projects across a broad range of vessel segments.
Tags: Alphaliner, LNG, Methanol
Recent Posts
Zero-carbon ammonia for shipping faces challenges
Wärtsilä signs lifecycle agreement for 7 Capital Gas LNG carriers
ABS releases report on nuclear LNG carrier design
NTPC develops indigenous catalyst for methanol production
Huangpu Wenchong receives AIP from CCS for ships using methanol and ammonia
Climate change will cause India’s GDP to decline by 24.7% by 2070: ADB
Masdar and EMSTEEL complete project using green hydrogen to produce steel
DNV Grants HHI AiP for ammonia DF large container vessel