Ammonia faces major cost and safety hurdles as a shipping fuel compared to others, such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), methanol, and biofuels. Jeslyn Lerh underlines ammonia’s appeal is that it is carbon free, and would be a zero-emission fuel if made from hydrogen produced with renewable electricity.
Globally, only 25 ammonia dual-fuel ships have been ordered as of 2024, trailing a fleet of at least 722 LNG-fuelled ships and 62 methanol-fuelled ships as of the same year which includes orders and ships that are already in operation.
Furthermore, refuelling ships, or bunkering, poses particular challenges with ammonia, which can cause acute poisoning and damage to the skin, eyes, and respiratory tract.
A study by the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) identified 400 risks associated with ammonia bunkering, which it says can be mitigated with measures such as emergency-release couplings to shut systems when a leak is detected.
Powering ships with ammonia can cost two to four times more than with conventional fuels, industry figures show, due to limited supply for the marine sector and an energy density about two-and-a-half times lower than traditional fuel.
Tags: Ammonia, GCMD, Zero Carbon
Recent Posts
Yara Birkeland Marks Three Years of Pioneering Zero-Emission Maritime Operations
HD Hyundai, Maersk Collaborate on Innovation in Decarbonization and Smart Logistics
First ship to have pioneering sensor installed to measure emissions of particles
Incat Tasmania launches world’s largest battery-electric ship
India to supply 4.12 lakh tonne green hydrogen derivatives to Japan, Singapore
Green hydrogen gets official stamp as India notifies certification scheme
Wärtsilä expands methane slip reduction capabilities by introducing NextDF technology
GS E&C, Amogy, and HD Hyundai Infracore partner with South Korean City Pohang-si