Switching to sustainable fuel is also key to the government’s aim to reach “jet zero” flying by 2050. But the Royal Society concludes there is currently no single, clear alternative to traditional fuel.
The trade body for UK airlines said the sector was committed to the 2050 target and that sustainable fuels would be a key factor in reaching it.
Flying is responsible for 2.4% of global greenhouse gas emissions and 8% of UK emissions. These gases warm the atmosphere, contributing to global warming and climate change.
Demand for flights is expected to increase, and governments and the aviation industry are experimenting with ways to reduce the climate impacts of traditional kerosene fuel.
The authors of the Royal Society report looked at four options for greener fuels to replace the 12.3m tonnes of jet fuel used annually in the UK.
It concluded that none could replace fossil jet fuel in the short term.
Some airlines now use very small amounts of biofuel, largely made from crops. London Heathrow is the largest global user of biofuels but it accounts for just 0.5% of the airport’s fuel.
To produce enough to supply the UK aviation industry would require half of Britain’s farming land, putting pressure on food supplies, the Royal Society says.
Another option is fuel made from hydrogen produced with green electricity. However the UK currently does not generate enough renewable electricity to make enough green hydrogen.
Another major barrier is that existing plane engines cannot use hydrogen-based fuel.
Ammonia and synthetic fuels are also under consideration, but they need even more green hydrogen and it is unclear if existing planes could use them.
The authors say it remains unclear exactly how much each alternative fuel would reduce the climate impacts of flying.
But they stress that in the long term a successful alternative fuel will probably be developed, but that airplanes and airports will need to be re-designed.
They are calling for more research into sustainable aviation fuel, suggesting that the UK could become a global leader if it invested in solving the problem.
A new fuel needs to be financially viable, safe, usable around the world, and to have high enough energy density to be used on long-distance flights, they say.
The trade body for UK airlines, Airlines UK, said in response that sustainable fuels were safe and increasingly commonplace, and that the sector was committed to the 2050 ‘jet zero’ target.
Regarding the Royal Society’s assertion that sufficiently supplying the UK aviation industry with sustainable fuels would put pressure on food supplies, Airlines UK said the UK had sufficient feedstocks, that they would be drawn initially from household, commercial, agricultural and forestry waste and waste industrial gases, and that they did not compete with food crops. Environmental campaigners say the government must also encourage people to fly less.
Tags: Alterative Fuel, Aviation, Climate Change, Jet Zero
Recent Posts
Vedanta Aluminium signs pact with GAIL for supply of natural gas
HMM introduces South Korea’s first LNG-powered vessels
NGEL inks pact with NREDCAP in Andhra for RE projects
Global warming won’t end if net zero is redefined
The Liberian Registry and Korean Register (KR) grant AiP to Samsung
To satisfy decarbonization targets, Big Oil invests billions in the manufacture of biofuel
ISO issues standards for methanol as a marine fuel
Amazon, partners to test electric trucks on a freight corridor in India