Union Minister Nitin Gadkari has repeatedly backed the need for increasing the country’s scale of ethanol production and recently underlined that farmers need to turn to ethanol production instead of growing conventional crops to increase profitability as well as enhance supply.
Gadkari highlighted that the need for flex fuel is primarily based on the fact that India spends around $0.11 million each year on importing fuel, a figure that can come down if flex fuels become widespread.
And for this, ethanol production needs to be enhanced. “Farmers in the country today give us foodgrains. But they should also start giving energy. The country currently spends $0.11 million a year on fuel import, and the amount can go up to $0.33 million in the future. If such a big amount goes to farmers, then they will not commit suicide,” he reportedly said in Aurangabad.
Gadkari also mentioned that automotive companies are ready to bring in flex engines to the country.
Last month, Gadkari had said that it would take at least six months for flex fuel engines to come to India. “We were planning to submit an affidavit in the Supreme Court to allow manufacturing of flex-fuel engines under the Euro IV emission norms…But now I feel that we will ask all vehicle manufacturers to make flex-fuel engines (that can run on more than one fuel) under the Euro VI emission norms in the next 6-8 months,” he had said.
The Centre recently issued a draft notification on ethanol blending in petrol. It proposes 12% and 15% ethanol blending in petrol as automotive fuels, which will be available as E-12 and E-15 respectively.
Source: Hindustan Times
Tags: Ethanol, Flex Fuel, Fuel Import, Green Fuel
Recent Posts
DPIIT promotes green logistics industry
Petronet LNG reports record volumes
TotalEnergies buys stake in wind farm to produce green hydrogen
Ports of Indiana, Port of Antwerp-Bruges partner on green shipping
Bhutan moves towards green transition
GCMD completes biofuel supply chain trials with Hapag-Lloyd
Airbus partners with Avolon on hydrogen aviation
Nuclear power transition more safe option for decarbonisation than coal